Why is it that many will believe almost anything they hear or read? You need to learn to only pay attention to the facts. Let me offer a recent real-time event and some of the wild imagination used by the experts about what happened. Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, a scheduled international flight operated by Malaysia Airlines, disappeared on 8 March 2014 while flying from Kuala Lumpur International Airport, Malaysia, to Beijing International Airport in China. The aircraft last made voice contact with air traffic control at 01:19 MYT, 8 March when it was over the South China Sea, less than an hour after takeoff. It disappeared from air traffic controllers' radar screens at 01:22 MYT. Malaysian military radar continued to track the aircraft as it deviated westwards from its planned flight path and crossed the Malay Peninsula. It left the range of Malaysian military radar at 02:22 while over the Andaman Sea, 200 nautical miles north-west of Penang in north-western Malaysia. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-200ER, was carrying 12 Malaysian crew members and 227 passengers.
In an article, I published some time ago, The Many Faces of Technical Analysts, one example was the Story Teller. I captured this idea from Barry Ritholtz when he asked the question “Are you a Trader or a Story Teller?” Parts of that section are reproduced below. In that article, I also discussed the Newbie, Hobbyist, Salesman, Practitioner, Academic, and Authors.
“The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding.” Leonardo da Vinci
Market breadth indicators are those indicators that are sometimes referred to as broad market indicators. Probably the simplest way to think of them is to realize they generally do not refer to, or use information relating to an individual issue. Breadth will treat all stocks in an index equally. The stock with the largest capitalization and the smallest are both equal in breadth analysis. Most breadth analysis is total market related in that it deals with the complete market. A rising tide raises all ships is the more picturesque way to grasp its meaning.
My apologies to the late Darrell Royal, the University of Texas football coach who used this saying often when defending his continued use of the “wishbone T,” an offensive football formation that some were always questioning. The saying has a valuable message that is applicable to many endeavors; simply, do not forget how you got where you are. It is very appropriate to investing strategies that have long-term success.
There are many who are now talking about the Hindenburg Omen so I thought I would explain what it is and where it now stands. This is easy since I knew Jim Miekka (creator of the Omen) as he offered to assist me when I included some of his material in my “The Complete Guide to Market Breadth Indicators.” Jim also made many other contributions to technical analysis, including a mathematical process to refresh the McClellan Summation Index.
The Hindenburg Omen is an indication of market tops and was created by James R. Miekka and dubbed “the Hindenburg Omen” by Kennedy Gammage of the Richland Report. You’ll recognize Kennedy as the former provider of the McClellan Oscillator and Summation Index numbers on FNN and now, CNBC television.
Most blog authors on StockCharts.com are writing about the current markets and do an exceptional job. I do not write about the current markets as I wanted to share my experiences after 40+ years as a technical analyst. Not only experiences with trading and investing, but model building and money management. I also share the details of all the Master’s degrees I have – those expensive learning experiences that hopefully I learned something from. Since I rarely go back into the archives of other’s blogs that I read, I wondered if that is common or not. Hence, after talking with Chip, a summary of my past articles might encourage new readers to take a look as most of the material is timeless. That’s timeless, not worthless! This is the sixth of the summary series and starts in August, 2016 and ends in October, 2016. I’ll try to do future summaries whenever I have a dozen or so articles to include. You can click on the article name for a link directly to the article.
Is this a market correction? Generally accepted levels (-10%) that most deem as a correction versus just a market pullback (-5%). Is this going to become a bear market (-20%)? First, there is not a person on Earth that knows the answer (despite what you hear on TV), and I do not even attempt to claim that I do. I read a great deal, too much maybe. Many believe this is just a correction in an ongoing bull market. Many technical analyst friends of mine strongly offer evidence that a bottom is going to be soon. And just as many think we are at the top.
This is the second in a series with the first few paragraphs the same as the first one. I am not sure why there are so many vague and totally subjective analysis techniques that have become part of technical analysis. Probably because the main stream Wall Street and their marketing department, academic finance, does not follow technical analysis like they do the accepted rubbish from the ivory towers. Early in this WHY series I tried to be convincing that technical analysis’ basic premise is the analysis of price; price that is determined in the auction marketplace. See the first WHY Are So Many Esoteric Things Attached to Technical Analysis here.
Support and resistance are mainstays in technical analysis; sadly, misused and abused by many. The purpose of this article is to hopefully explain why they work when used properly. I have to admit that when I first got interested in technical analysis and charting, I drew trendlines all over the place. Once I began to fully understand the basic premise of technical analysis; that it is based upon price; price that is determined in the auction market by buyers and sellers. I have discussed my thoughts on trendlines in an earlier article but after 45 years only now consider horizontal trendlines since they are based upon price. I see others drawing trendlines all over charts connecting visually appealing points at bottoms and tops, often not with much accuracy. That is the only good thing they are doing; most non-horizontal trendlines should be drawn with a large brush or marker. Just switching from arithmetic to semi-log charts can change them.
This is an attempt to help validate new high and new low data and, to be honest, is still a “work in progress.” If you consider the facts relating to new highs and new lows, you will see the necessity for this. A new high means that the closing price reached a high that it had not seen in the last year (52 weeks). Similarly, a new low is at a low not seen for at least a year. Note: This makes them very different than Advances, Declines, Up Volume, and Down Volume, which are based upon the difference over the previous day. These indicators try to identify when the new high or new low is determined to be good or bad using the following line of thinking.