![]() | ||
|
| ||

|
Hello Fellow Chart Watchers! "Old Economy" stocks came back to life last week causing the Dow to gain more than 2.4% for the week. The energy-heavy Amex Composite posted a 1.7% gain however the "New Economy"-heavy Nasdaq only managed a 0.06% gain. A quick peek at our one-week S&P Sector PerfChart shows just how big last week was for the "oldies" as Industrials (+5.67%), Basic Industry (+5.08%), Energy (+4.17%), and Cyclicals (+2.36%) led the way. It's another jam-packed issue of CWW this week folks, with Arthur's market comments, our columnist summary and some more exciting site news (any Canadian investors out there?). But first, since "Rotation" seems to be the word this week, I thought I would show you how our interactive PerfCharts can help spot this powerful market dynamic in action: Here are some snapshots and commentary that may help you see what I'm talking about:
While this technique is fairly subjective and by no means fool-proof, it forces you to consider the "big picture" - something that studies have shown can account for up to 60% of stock price movements. Be sure to review our Sector Analysis page at least once a month. OK, on with the show! Arthur Hill's latest market thoughts are below, but first...
On StockCharts.com right now:
The NYSE Composite ($NYA) continues to steal headlines from the Nasdaq with record highs and outperformance. However, the index cannot maintain above key resistance at 660. Since reaching 660 in Mar-00, the index has made at least 7 attempts to break through. With each attempt there is a surge in momentum and a decline with each failure. This has caused MACD to cross the zero line 8 times in the last few months. With the latest attempt at 660, MACD could be forming a lower high. I would not consider this confirmed though until a lower low forms and/or the index breaks below 640. In addition to weak momentum, money flows have also weakened on the latest attempt to break resistance. CMF (20) moved above zero with each previous attempt, but the positive readings became smaller and smaller after the May peak. For a cumulative view of CMF, I look at the Accumulation Distribution Line (ADL). The formula behind Chaikin Money Flow comes from the ADL and Marc Chaikin developed both indicators. Whenever new highs are recorded in an index, the ADL should also be making new highs. Failure would result in a negative divergence and have potential bearish implications. Judging by the weakness in CMF, it should come as no surprise that the ADL formed a series of lower highs and lower lows over the last two months. The current high is lower than the June and July highs, while the July low easily surpassed the June low. While it is encouraging that the NYSE Composite remains so close to new highs, the negative assessments of CMF and ADL indicate distribution. ![]() With the NYSE Composite so close to new highs and the Nasdaq 100 well below, I started to look at some comparative ratios. One method of comparing interest in the Nasdaq versus the NYSE is to look at the volume ratio (Nasdaq Volume / NYSE Volume). The other is to simply look at the price relative (Nasdaq 100 / NYSE Composite). I have plotted both on the chart, but will only be discussing the volume ratio. When the volume ratio moves higher, it indicates that more volume is going into the Nasdaq than the NYSE. A lower ratio indicates that more volume is going into the NYSE than Nasdaq. ![]() For most of 1997, 1998 and 1999, the 20-day EMA of the volume ratio moved above and below 1.3. There was a sharp decline in the Aug-98 with the emerging markets crisis, but the ratio snapped back by the end of the year. The real explosion came late in 1999 and early 2000 when the ratio rose above 1.70. In December, January, February and March, there was a huge acceleration of interest in the Nasdaq and relative volume levels reflected this. For the Nasdaq 100 to advance from around 3500 to 4500 it took a massive infusion of volume, and the NYSE Composite suffered as a result. After the sharp decline in April, the volume ratio dropped below 1.6 for the first time since early February. Even on the latest advance, the volume ratio failed to exceed its previous high and broke back below 1.5 on the latest decline. The question I must ask myself is: Can the Nasdaq mount a successful rally without an increase in the volume ratio. I would venture to guess that as long as this ratio remains below 1.6, a sustainable rally could be difficult to come by. Furthermore, a low volume ratio could benefit the NYSE and old guard stocks that have been punished for the past 18 months. Here are some links that should help you get started:
Did you know that the best way you can help StockCharts.com is by recommending us to a friend? We need your help to spread the word about our site by forwarding this newsletter to everyone you know. Thanks! Questions? Comments? Concerns? Problems? Suggestions? Simply 'r'eply to this email message and I'll see what I can do. Take care, ABOUT YOUR SUBSCRIPTION: You are receiving this mailing because your email address was entered into the subscription form on our web site. To unsubscribe, or to switch between our HTML version and the Plain Text version, use the form on our Subscriber page. If you have any problems, simply 'r'eply to this email and I'll try to fix things by hand. |