Issue Date: 2003 Sep 20 

Chip Anderson: Touring the Yield Curve
John Murphy: Watching S&P Support Levels
StockCharts Web Site News: Important VIX Changes
Richard Rhodes: Looking at NYSE Resistance
Carl Swenlin: Rydex's New ETF has an Important Difference)
Arthur Hill: On Hiatus

BOOKSTORE SPECIAL! -- Greg Morris' book Candlestick Charting Explained is now on sale in our online book store for 35% off its normal cover price. For only $24.95 you can now own the definitive work on candlestick pattern analysis. Don't delay. They're going fast!

Hello Fellow ChartWatchers!

Once again, the September-October part of the year is turning out to be a very important time for the markets.  The Nasdaq is closing in on 2000, the Dow is taking aim at 9750, Gold is higher than it's been in almost 7 years, and the Bullish Percent charts remain at ridiculously high levels.  This is a great time to be a Chart Watcher!

Later on in this issue, John Murphy and Richard Rhodes both point out some reasons for caution while Carl Swenlin presents an in-depth article on one of Rydex's new ETFs.  Also, be sure to read about the big changes that the CBOE just implemented for their Volatility Index ($VIX).  But first...

Touring the Yield Curve

One of the least used tools on StockCharts.com - our Dynamic Yield Curve chart - was in the news recently as the Federal Reserve decided to leave interest rates unchanged for now.  I thought it'd be a good time to review this chart and see what it can teach us about bull and bear markets.  You can find the link to this tool on the left side of our home page or at the bottom of our "Free Charts" page.  It's a Java applet and when it appears, you should see something like this:


On the left side is the Yield curve itself - a plot of bond yields by bond duration.  The black line is the yield curve for "today" (19 September 2003 - see the date in the lower left corner?) and the blue-green lines show what the yield curve was during the last 30 days.  On the right side is a chart of the S&P 500 index.  For more details on how the yield curve is constructed, see the Glossary entry in ChartSchool.

We call this our Dynamic Yield Curve chart because you can click anywhere on the S&P 500 chart and see what the Yield Curve was at that particular time.  For instance, if I click near the start of 1996, I instantly see the following:


Wait a second...  Look at the difference in the shape of the yield curve on the two charts above.  While the long-term (30Y) yields are pretty similar (~5%), the short-term yields are very different.  In 1996, in the middle of a huge bull market, money was tight and short term yields were almost as high as long term yields.  Right now however, those yields are more than 4% lower!

Let's see what happened to bond yields between 1996 and now.  You can do that with our Dynamic Yield Curve by either clicking and dragging your mouse along the S&P 500 chart, or by clicking once (around Jan. 1996) and then holding down the right arrow key on your keyboard.

In the first half of 1996 (above), the yield curve looked like a relatively straight line.  During 1996, it quickly regained its typical sideways-"L" appearance and then moved to its highest levels during July just before the market dipped. When the market quickly recovered in August, long-term yields briefly returned to their high level but then fell throughout the rest of the year.

The next market "hiccup" happened in April 1997.  At the end of March, long-term yields were setting new highs again in the 7+% range.  Stock fell sharply in the first week of April, but recovered quickly.  This time however yields remained relatively high throughout the "dip" as the chart below shows.

Over the next 16 months, yields slowly fell and once again the yield curve flattened out.  It is interesting to note that short-term yields had not moved much up to this point in our journey.  They have been "pegged" so far near 5% since before January 1996.  The Asian Currency Crisis in 1998 would change all that however.  It started on July 21st, 1998.  The yield curve reached its low point on October 5th, leaving us with a very dramatic chart:


In just over two months, short-term yields had fallen almost a full percentage point.  See how broad the blue-green area above the black line is?   This tells us that the decline was quick and that the straight shape of the yield curve remained relatively constant.  When yields started to rise again, short-term bonds lagged the long-term bonds.  It was only after the curve regained its sideways-"L" shape that short-term yields started to rise once more.

The yield curve continued to rise (are you following along on the dynamic chart?) throughout 1999 and early 2000 but on January 26th, 2000 a very important thing happened - the 30Y yield fell below the level of the 10Y bond officially signaling an inverted yield curve.

This was followed by a period of very different looking curves as the bull market ended and the bear market began.  Horizontal lines, regular "J" shapes, irregular "J" shapes - you name it.  The "goofiest" curve may have happened on October 23rd, 2000.  On that date, short-term yields were higher than the longer term bonds - a situation that only makes sense in a deflationary economy! 

It wasn't until after the market bounced in May of 2001 that the typical sideways-"L" shape returned.  After September 11th, short-term yields dropped dramatically again - reaching their lowest point on January 14th, 2002:

It's helpful to stop at this point and compare the yield curve above (from the heart of a bear market) with the one from from the bull market period earlier in this article - the 30 April 1997 chart for instance. Note how much lower the curve is on the chart and how much larger the difference is between the short-term yields and the long-term yields.

We've got one last stop on our guided tour - the market bottom that happened in October 2002 (or possibly March 2003).

The interesting thing here is that nothing interesting happened to the yield curve.  It didn't change in any dramatic way at those turning points, nor has it changed too much from then until now (see the chart at the very top of the article again to see what I mean).  Certainly, nothing as dramatic as what happened at the bull market top.

Sorry for all the charts in this article, but I hope this has helped you see the value of this nifty free tool.  Check out our Dynamic Yield Curve often for a unique perspective on the markets.

- Chip Anderson

Watching S&P Support Levels

WATCHING SUPPORT LEVELS... Even with Friday's modest setback, the stock market had a good week. All major averages hit new highs for the year. Not everything is perfect however. Yesterday, I suggested keeping an eye on support levels in the QQQ at the 20-day moving average and the mid-September low. The same holds true for the S&P 500. The latest move into new highs is the third upleg from the August bottom. Elliot Wavers will see that as a fifth wave. At the same time, the 14-day RSI is showing short-term negative divergence. That's a minor warning that the market looks over-extended. That being the case, it's a good idea to keep an eye on support levels as a defensive measure. The first support level is the 20-day average at 1016. The second is the mid-September low at 1007. We're still in the dangerous September-October period.

- John Murphy

 

Since the last issue of ChartWatchers went out, John Murphy's subscribers received these timely, chart-packed articles:

MARKET PULLS BACK ON LIGHT VOLUME -- MICROSOFT BREAKS OUT -- RISING YEN HELPS GOLD
MARKET HITS NEW RECOVERY HIGHS -- FINANCIALS, TECHS, AND TRANSPORTS LEAD WAY -- YEN HITS 2-YEAR HIGH
TRANSPORTATION LEADERS -- AMERICAN EXPRESS LEADS DOW HIGHER -- IBM BREAKS THROUGH 90
FINANCIALS LEAD MARKET HIGHER -- FALLING OIL PUSHES TRANSPORTS TO NEW RECOVERY HIGH
TOBACCO LIGHTS UP -- HEALTHCARE GAINS -- ENERGY STOCKS CONTINUE TO SINK ON WEAK CRUDE OIL
FED LEAVES RATES UNCHANGED -- CISCO AND GE HIT HIGHS -- MORGAN STANLEY LEADS STRONG BROKERAGE GROUP
LOW INFLATION DATA SHOULD KEEP FED ON HOLD -- KROGER LEADS FOOD DECLINE -- QUALCOMM IS BREAKING OUT
BASIC MATERIAL STOCKS LEAD FRIDAY BOUNCE ---QQQs BOUNCE OFF 20-DAY SUPPORT LINE
DROP IN CONSUMER CONFIDENCE BOOST BONDS -- WEAKENS STOCKS AND THE DOLLAR
TECHS LEAD LOW-VOLUME BOUNCE -- IBM SURVIVES DOWNGRADE -- AIRLINES ADVANCE
HOMEBUILDERS CRUMBLE -- ABBOTT LABS, CAPITAL ONE, AND SOUTHWEST AIR ADVANCE
PROFIT-TAKING IN CHIPS COINCIDES WITH BOTTOM-FISHING IN DRUGS

Don't you deserve to see this kind of analysis as soon as it's published?
Subscribe to John Murphy's Market Message today!


- Advertisement -

 

VIX CHANGES - This weekend, the CBOE is changing the definition of their Volatility index - $VIX. Until now, that index was based on options tied to the S&P 100 index since that was the most widely traded index at the time the VIX was introduced. Time change and so do the indices.  From now on, $VIX will be calculated based on options tied to the S&P 500. People that want the gory details behind the new calculation should check out this CBOE article. The CBOE has back-calculated values for the new $VIX going back to 1990.  People who love the old method shouldn't panic, the CBOE is continuing to publish it under a new symbol - $VXO. Look for StockCharts.com to have these new indices in place by Monday AM.

$ONE IS THE LONELIEST NUMBER - Speaking of the VIX, we've just added an advanced feature that savvy chartists will get a kick out of. We've added a special index called $ONE that is always equal to 1.0. Why is that important? Because you can combine it with any index or stock to create an inverse ratio chart. Just enter a ticker symbol of "$ONE:(symbol)" - replace "(symbol)" with the thing you want to invert. Now you can look at inverted indicators like $VIX "properly":

 

Looking at NYSE Resistance

Quite simply, the recent rally in the NYSE Index is moving into longer-term resistance. And given the extent of the rally off the lowsa decline from previous low support turned resistance as well as the 50-month moving average levels is highly probable. In effect short positions are warranted, with the maximum upside exposure to the underside of the previous bull-market trendline near 6000or about 2%-3% from current levels. However, if the only a mere correction develops then a 10% or so decline can be expected; but, if something larger is afootthen a decline back to the lows at 4500 cannot be ruled out. Thus, for risking 2%-3% the potential gains are from 10% to 25%. We like them oddsand we are taking them.

- Richard Rhodes

 

Want more of Richard's award-winning advice? Check out his Web site: TheRhodesReport.com


- Advertisement -


FREE REPORT!


5
Telecom Stocks Rising from the Ashes
;

Sometimes the best stocks can come from the most unlikely places. That's exactly what technology experts Bill Martin and Matt Ragas describe in this free report: Those stocks that are ready to rise - and profit - out of the ashes of the telecom industry. Read their compelling rationale why select investing in smart telecom companies promises big returns down the road. And discover which 5 stocks they see as preparing to soar once more.

Click here now to learn more:
http://www.rightsideadvisors.com/promo/findprofitpromo.asp?aid=103

Rydex's New ETF has an Important Difference

On April 30, 2003 the new Rydex SP Equal Weight ETF (RSP) began trading. It is based on the S&P EWI (Equal Weighted Index), an index composed of the S&P 500 stocks but calculated in a way to give each stock an equal weighting. The index is rebalanced quarterly. While RSP is a relatively new security, we fortunately have data prior to 4/30/2003 , which has been derived from back calculations of the S&P Equal Weight Index performed by Rydex and Standard & Poors. It is an accurate depiction of how RSP would have performed, and it allows us to examine RSP performance over a wide range of market conditions.

Now, why do I think this new product is so important? Because an equal weighted index: (1) provides investors with true diversification; (2) is not subject to the fortunes of a handful of stocks with very high market caps; (3) has the potential to out-perform the cap-weighted version; and (4) could help technical indicators provide better forecasting results.

Capitalization-weighted indexes do not provide true diversification For example, about 70% of the S&P 500 weighting is in the 50 (10%) largest stocks, so claims by many financial advisors that investing in an S&P 500 Index fund diversifies your portfolio over 500 stocks is simply not true. With investment products that track the S&P EWI, you truly can attain broad diversification.

Perhaps the best argument for this equal-weighted index is that there is a direct relationship between price performance and the derivative indicators. Virtually all market indicators, like the Advance-Decline Line, are unweighted indicators -- each stock in the index carries an equal weight. Unfortunately, using them to analyze their cap-weighted price indexes is not always effective because the movement of the price index is determined by the weight of a just a few stocks. Now the relationship of the price and internal indicators should prove much more helpful to our analysis.

Performance is an important issue, so how does RSP perform relative to the S&P 500 Index? On the chart below we compare the two indexes going back to 1990. At the bottom of the chart is a ratio index that divides the RSP by the SPX. When that index is rising, it means RSP is stronger than the SPX.

It is interesting to note that there was an extended period between 1995 and 2000 where RSP underperformed the SPX. This was the period when the mass market discovered stock investing, and indexing (investing in index funds) became extremely popular. Because of this, money became concentrated in large-cap stocks, causing them to appreciate at a faster rate than smaller-cap stocks. This divergence reversed after the SPX topped in 2000, caused primarily by the fact that large-cap stocks began to tank. RSP did not begin a serious decline until mid-2002, which is when stocks, large-cap and smaller-cap, were being abandoned across the board.

There are some interesting statistics regarding comparative performance. From the 1990 bear market low to the bull market highs in 2000 (SPX) and 2001 (RSP) the SPX rallied +428% versus +408% for RSP. The bear market decline into the October 2002 low took the SPX down -50% versus only -40% for RSP. Finally, as of 9/16/2003 the rally from the October 2002 low has taken the SPX up only +33% versus +54% for RSP. Surprisingly RSP is only -8% off its all-time high versus -33% for the SPX. The chart below gives us a closer look at the more recent time frame.

The Rydex SP Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has characteristics that make it superior to capitalization-weighted versions of broad stock market indexes. I think it tends to be more stable, and will generally perform better except during times when indexing is dominant preference of investors.

Decision Point has a Straight Shot series on RSP, which presents a series of indicator charts derived from the stocks in the S&P 500 Index. This permits the useful comparison of equal-weighted indicators against an equal-weighted price index.

Additional information regarding RSP can be found on the Rydex web site.

- Carl Swenlin

 

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: We've just published a new online tour of the Decision Point website. I strongly encourage everyone to review this information to see what Carl's site has to offer. It is truly amazing! Click here to get started.

I'm on hiatus this week but will return for the next edition of ChartWatchers.

- Arthur Hill

 

Arthur Hill wrote much on the material in the ChartSchool area of StockCharts.com. For more of his market insights, check out TDTrader.com


- Advertisement -

Take the Online Tour - Get an overview of our various tools and how they work

Experiment with our Free Tools - Try our tools for yourself

Go to ChartSchool - Learn the basics of Technical Analysis or brush up on your techniques

Read More ChartWatchers - Check out the archived issues of this newsletter

Did you enjoy this newsletter? Send it to a friend!
Not a Subscriber? Sign Up Now!

SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES: Click here to unsubscribe or modify your subscription options.



Copyright © 2006 by StockCharts.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.