- Rank: 47
- Followers: 13
- Votes: 184
- Years Member: 20
- Last Update: 24 September 2021, 9:35
Categories:Elliott Wave Analysis
After 3 months using harmonic wave theory it appears both methods will get you to the same place with harmonic making for a cleaner count, with less creativity needed, and 5th waves being much easier to identify. Overall I think harmonic is cleaner and easier to interpret.
I have used a combination of Elliott/Frost & Prechter/Neely for many years. Throughout that time I noticed there was something off with that. 3-wave patterns where 5-wave patterns should be, missing 4th and 5th waves, what I thought were 4th waves actually being part of higher degree corrections... Thus a measure of creativity has been necessary to make traditional Elliott theory fit what was happening. I recently studied Harmonic wave theory per Ian Copsey where 1-3-5 of impulse waves are a-b-c instead of 1-2-3-4-5. That seems to be the answer but I am still a work in progress in figuring out if that can be used in real time. So my counts may be a mess until I determine if that is the answer.
The great mistake is to anticipate the outcome of the engagement; you ought not to be thinking of whether it ends in victory or in defeat. Let nature take its course and your tools will strike at the right moment.
Disclaimer: this is all just my opinion and I present these charts in hopes they may help others to learn something. Make your own decisions and never trade anything based on my opinions, interpretations, and biases whatever they may be.
6/6/2004: According to Zoran Grayer a .707 fibo is a common relationship for Dow reversals and bifurcation points. He also mentions the 3rd high or low in a sequence will often be the point where market direction reveals itself.
This information is presented for education purposes only. StockCharts.com is not responsible for any comments, advice, or annotations presented on this page. Please review our Terms of Service for more details.